• Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 days ago

    DeepSeek has really led the way here, especially as they are a bit more hardware constrained. Plus they openly publish their findings and release open source models, so high hopes there.

    It’s probably China’s play to pop the AI bubble, but I’m all for it (:

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I wonder what all is in the deepseek code that is malicious. I’d like to try it but don’t want a million Mb/s of tracker shit across my network and can’t run it myself.

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The beauty of it is that it doesn’t need tracker shit. It works to destroy the US AI bubble even without anything malicious within.

        And considering how hard the US researchers have been trying to control the output of their general LLMs, with little success, why would the Chinese have found a way before everyone else even thinks it’s possible?

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        AFAIK, their open models are distributed as weights, not executables and are therefore not able to start network connections / run code. There is if of course tool-calling functionality but that just works by having the model output a special pattern and having something external run predetermined commands based on that.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        They are open source models, nothing malicious about them. I’d be much more careful about where you run your agents on. The wrong prompt can even make a non-malicious model misbehave.