Lojcs@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 days agoDamnmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up131
arrow-up131imageDamnmedia.piefed.socialLojcs@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-220 days agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareZC3rr0r@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·20 days agoI’m struggling to get that context from the image. Where does it say or imply she was raped?
minus-squarewaterbird@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·20 days agoshe was 16. a person cannot meaningfully consent at that age. in many jurisdictions it is illegal for someone to engage with a person that age, and it would be considered statutory rape.
minus-squareZC3rr0r@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·20 days agoRight. That makes sense and I’m surprised I didn’t pick up on that one.
minus-squareLojcs@piefed.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·20 days agoShe was 16 and a porno director made her star in his movies…
minus-squareZC3rr0r@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·20 days agoYeah, now that it’s written out like that I’m surprised I missed that.
I’m struggling to get that context from the image. Where does it say or imply she was raped?
she was 16. a person cannot meaningfully consent at that age. in many jurisdictions it is illegal for someone to engage with a person that age, and it would be considered statutory rape.
Right. That makes sense and I’m surprised I didn’t pick up on that one.
She was 16 and a porno director made her star in his movies…
Yeah, now that it’s written out like that I’m surprised I missed that.