• egregiousRac@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 days ago

    According to Wikipedia, nothing distinguishes a totenkopf from other skull symbols, with or without bones behind it. Poison symbol? Totenkopf. Punisher logo? Totenkopf. Skull with a bullet hole in it? Believe it or not, totenkopf.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      This is so fucking disingenuous.

      Might want to think about taking a step back and considering why you’re defending Nazi symbology

      • egregiousRac@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        Go read the Wikipedia page. It’s silly.

        I have no idea if it’s a realistic depiction of what qualifies or not, but practically any skull used in a vaguely militaristic context qualifies under its description.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Then wow it must just be a crazy coincidence that the tattoo he got on his chest is the exact design that Wikipedia (and pretty much every other site about Nazi symbology) chose to show as an example.

          What bad luck! 🙄