I just hate these soft-language bait headlines when reporting on scientific studies. If the article was “going from shitty fast food diet to plant-based shitty fast food diet results in statistically healthier outcomes”, that would be interesting and newsworthy. But the whole “doing this thing may affect other thing” allows the reader to apply their biases to whatever they’re reading.
Yeah, so I took a quick read of it… It’s even better, it’s not plant based vs omnivore… it’s actually Whole food (plant or animal) plus exercise vs standard processed diet and no exercise.
I just hate these soft-language bait headlines when reporting on scientific studies. If the article was “going from shitty fast food diet to plant-based shitty fast food diet results in statistically healthier outcomes”, that would be interesting and newsworthy. But the whole “doing this thing may affect other thing” allows the reader to apply their biases to whatever they’re reading.
Yeah, so I took a quick read of it… It’s even better, it’s not plant based vs omnivore… it’s actually Whole food (plant or animal) plus exercise vs standard processed diet and no exercise.