As they should have. All’s fair in love and war. No ‘/s’ needed.

Work sucks. That’s why.

I get that. It just seems arbitrarily limited to me. And voice actors are real people too.

You’d think it’d be pretty simple to disprove it’s a.i., though.

Will they even save money? Once the techlords start charging what they actually need to, I’m not sure they will.

That said, the idea of hurting ‘brands’ and their ad agencies gave me a little bit of a chub if I’m honest.

Synthetic performers are defined under state law as “digitally-created media that appear as a real person.” The law applies to ads in any medium.

Ok, but what about other kinds of a.i. generated performers, like animated ones? I reckon anything a.i. generated should be labelled as such.

It’s like he’s daring the people to revolt. And when they don’t after every ludicrous thing he tries, he just tries something even more ludicrous. I’m morbidly curious about where the line actually is at this point, because I thought it had been crossed ages ago.

Unfortunately for the species, yes.

Can’t park there, mate.

Also of being a massive arsehole.

I’m thinking it was an autocorrect snafu for ‘fallible’.

It’d make more sense to do it vertically, I reckon.

I had Floxas once, but a round of antibiotics and a high-fibre diet fixed it right up.

Investing trillions in garbage is what makes the world go around.

I personally don’t like it because it’s a combination of unreliable and bland that I just don’t want anything to do with. I have no valid use for it that a search engine can’t do anyway.

Then there’s all the planet-burning/economy-wrecking stuff that I’m not all that keen on either.

It’s not so much the stolen content that’s the problem, it’s them selling it on, or even more egregiously, replacing the people they stole the content from originally.

What happens on the next panel!?

Peterson: “What do you mean by ‘Let’s say’?”

Thoughts and/or prayers.

It’s only so they can replace her with someone even worse.

I can hear that gif.